Container terminal at dusk with cranes, a berthed vessel and quayside electrical infrastructure

BRIDGE ELECTRIFY · A Bridge EMIP platform

Onshore power supply · whole-port energy

Know your port’s shore-power demand before you build.

We model OPS demand port by port from real ship-call records, test the scenarios that drive cost, and turn them into an integrated, phased energy and delivery plan for the whole port.

TEN-T core maritime ports surveyed
97
for public ship-call records
ports modelled
19
where calls with actual times are published
merchant calls in the model
400,542
historical coverage varies by port
annual energy, 2025
777 GWh
mid power, full adoption, all 19 ports

Modelled estimates from public ship-call records, as shown in the Bridge Power working model v0.2.1 (built 2026-11-10). Surveyed ports were checked for public call records; only ports publishing calls with actual times are modelled.

Modelled ports

Every port has its own demand shape.

Selected examples of ports preliminarily modelled using public call data; indicative estimates, not completed client engagements or endorsements.

Explore modelled ports

Spain

Valencia

Annual energy
192.6GWh
Mean
22.0MW
P95
32.1MW

Spain

Las Palmas

Annual energy
83.9GWh
Mean
9.6MW
P95
15.7MW

Spain

Palma de Mallorca

Annual energy
65.6GWh
Mean
7.5MW
P95
23.7MW
Assess my portStart with a short enquiry

Scenario: 2025 · mid power · full adoption. Six examples on the Modelled ports page.

Worked example · Hamina, Finland

What a baseline actually tells you.

3.7 GWh
annual energy, 2025
0.4 MW
mean demand
1.1 MW
P95 — not exceeded in 95% of hours
4.5 MW
highest single hour

The gap between P95 and the highest hour is the planning question. P95 is a demand threshold, not a grid design: a cap at that level is exceeded in about 5% of hours, and the duration of those peaks and the energy above the cap must be assessed before storage or operational limits can be sized. Here, every vessel figure is still a category estimate — measured data would sharpen it.

Scenario: 2025 · mid power · full adoption, 60-minute interval, ±30-minute connection window.

Hamina scenario workspace showing adoption, power level, connection window and supply cap controls beside energy, mean, P95 and peak results
Hamina scenario workspace — figures are model estimates, not measured energy. Static preview from the Bridge Power working model v0.2.1, captured 2026-11-10.
Static map previewNot interactive
Map of European TEN-T core ports by data status: 19 modelled, 26 with call data being recorded, 31 aggregates only, 21 with no public data
European ports by data status: 97 surveyed, 19 modelled. Static preview from the Bridge Power working model v0.2.1, captured 2026-11-10. Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL).

Explorer & scenarios

The decisions a baseline supports.

  • Which vessels and berths first

    Rank berths by the energy and connection hours they would actually deliver, by vessel type.

  • Annual energy versus power

    Annual GWh frames the business case. Hourly profiles, mean, P95 and peaks inform grid and phasing discussions. P95 covers 95% of hours, not 95% of energy.

  • Adoption, connection and capacity

    Compare current, regulatory-driven, phased and full adoption, with connection times and a supply cap.

  • Phased investment

    See where a capped first phase covers most hours, and what storage or reinforcement would cover the rest.

  • Data gaps, made explicit

    Every figure shows its evidence level, so you know what your own data would improve.

Open the port explorer

What you receive

A baseline you can take to your board, utility or tender.

You receive

  • Hourly OPS demand baseline by vessel type and berth
  • Annual energy, mean, P95 and peak power for agreed scenarios
  • Supply-cap check: hours above cap, unmet energy, storage to cover
  • A clear list of data gaps and what would close them

We need from you

  • Port name and the berths or terminals in scope
  • The question you need answered (e.g. grid application, phasing, tender)
  • Later, if useful: berth allocation, vessel lists or metered loads — shared under an agreement

Beyond the berth

From vessel demand to a deliverable whole-port plan.

Bridge then brings terminals, equipment, charging, grid and generation into one system, and helps shape delivery — including equipment supply and concession or partnership structures, with scope and commercial interests made clear in each engagement.

01

Vessel & OPS baseline and scenarios

Turn public and port call data into hourly onshore power supply (OPS) demand by vessel type and berth — then test adoption, vessel power, connection time and supply-capacity scenarios.

02

Incorporate the whole port

Bring in terminals, charging, equipment electrification, the grid connection and on-site generation as one connected system.

03

Optimise system & delivery

Test storage, tariffs, phasing and lifecycle cost — and compare ownership against concession or partnership structures.

Client workspace

Your results, released to a private workspace.

Invited clients see each assessment stage and its approved releases in a private, sign-in-only workspace. Nothing is published to you without review.

Planned module

Vessel & OPS baseline

Available within a scoped engagement; model integration follows.

Planned module

Whole-port demand

Available within a scoped engagement; model integration follows.

Planned module

System optimisation

Available within a scoped engagement; model integration follows.

Start with your port's OPS baseline.

Name your port and the question you need answered. We'll suggest a sensible, scoped first step.